Net Neutrality: What You Need to Know Now

In a 3-2 vote on Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission approved a measure to remove the tough net neutrality rules it put in place just two years ago. Those rules prevented internet providers from blocking and throttling traffic and offering paid fast lanes. They also classified internet providers as Title II common carriers in order to give the measure strong legal backing.

When you go online you have certain expectations. You expect to be connected to whatever website you want. You expect that your cable or phone company isn’t messing with the data and is connecting you to all websites, applications and content you choose. You expect to be in control of your internet experience.

Thursday’s vote undoes all of that.


Net Neutrality is the basic principle that prohibits internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use. Net Neutrality is the way that the internet has always worked.

In 2015, millions of activists pressured the Federal Communications Commission to adopt historic Net Neutrality rules that keep the internet free and open — allowing people to share and access information of their choosing without interference.

But right now the internet is in peril. On Dec. 14, 2017, the FCC’s Republican majority approved Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to gut the Net Neutrality protections.

A former Verizon lawyer and a Trump appointee, Pai ignored the widespread outcry against his plan from millions of people, lawmakers, companies andco public-interest groups.


We can’t let Pai have the last word on this — which is why we’re calling on Congress to use a “resolution of disapproval” to overturn the FCC’s vote to dismantle the Net Neutrality rules.

Urge lawmakers to reverse the FCC vote today.

What is Net Neutrality?

Net Neutrality is the internet’s guiding principle: It preserves our right to communicate freely online. Net Neutrality means an internet that enables and protects free speech. It means that ISPs should provide us with open networks — and shouldn’t block or discriminate against any applications or content that ride over those networks. Just as your phone company shouldn’t decide who you call and what you say on that call, your ISP shouldn’t interfere with the content you view or post online.

The internet without Net Neutrality isn’t really the internet.

What will happen to the internet now?

Without the Net Neutrality rules, companies like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon will be able to call all the shots and decide which websites, content and applications succeed.

These companies can now slow down their competitors’ content or block political opinions they disagree with. They can charge extra fees to the few content companies that can afford to pay for preferential treatment — relegating everyone else to a slower tier of service.

The consequences will be particularly devastating for marginalized communities media outlets have misrepresented or failed to serve. People of color, the LGBTQ community, indigenous peoples and religious minorities in the United States rely on the open internet to organize, access economic and educational opportunities, and fight back against systemic discrimination.


Without Net Neutrality, how will activists be able to fight oppression? How will the next disruptive technology, business or company emerge if internet service providers let only incumbents succeed?

Tell me about the Title II rules we just lost. Why is Title II so important?

After a decade-long battle over the future of the internet, in 2015 the FCC adopted strong Net Neutrality rules based on Title II of the Communications Act, giving internet users the strongest protections possible.

Courts rejected two earlier FCC attempts to craft Net Neutrality rules and told the agency that if it wanted to adopt such protections it needed to use the proper legal foundation: Title II. In February 2015, the FCC did just that when it reclassified broadband providers as common carriers under Title II.

Title II gave the FCC the authority it needed to ensure that companies like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon can’t block, throttle or otherwise interfere with web traffic. Title II preserved the internet’s level playing field, allowing people to share and access information of their choosing. These rules ushered in a historic era of online innovation and investment.


The Title II rules also withstood two challenges from industry. Free Press helped argue the case defending the FCC — and on June 14, 2016, a federal appeals court upheld the open-internet protections in all respects.

We’re now preparing to sue the FCC to restore the Title II rules.

Why is Net Neutrality so crucial for communities of color?

The open internet allows people of color to tell their own stories and organize for racial justice. When activists are able to turn out thousands of people in the streets at a moment’s notice, it’s because ISPs aren’t allowed to block their messages or websites.

The mainstream media have long misrepresented, ignored and harmed people of color. And thanks to economic inequality and runaway media consolidation, people of color own just a handful of broadcast stations.

This dynamic will only get worse: In 2017, Chairman Pai demolished most of the remaining media-ownership rules. The lack of diverse ownership is a primary reason why the media have gotten away with criminalizing and dehumanizing communities of color.

The open internet allows people of color and other vulnerable communities to bypass traditional media gatekeepers. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs could block speech and prevent dissident voices from speaking freely online. Without Net Neutrality, people of color would lose a vital platform.

And without Net Neutrality, millions of small businesses owned by people of color wouldn’t be able to compete against larger corporations online, which would deepen economic disparities.

Why is Net Neutrality important for businesses?

Net Neutrality is crucial for small business owners, startups and entrepreneurs, who rely on the open internet to launch their businesses, create markets, advertise their products and services, and reach customers. We need the open internet to foster job growth, competition and innovation.

It’s thanks to Net Neutrality that small businesses and entrepreneurs have been able to thrive online. But without Net Neutrality, ISPs will exploit their gatekeeper position and destroy the internet’s fair and level playing field.

Without Net Neutrality, the next Google or Facebook will never get off the ground.


What can we do now?

Congress has the power to reverse the FCC’s vote. Urge your lawmakers to use a “resolution of disapproval” to overturn the FCC’s decision to dismantle the Net Neutrality rules.

The Trump administration is doing everything in its power to clamp down on dissent. If we lose Net Neutrality, it will have succeeded.



Support This News For $5.00 A Month.

35 thoughts on “Net Neutrality: What You Need to Know Now

  • December 15, 2017 at 9:49 pm

    Government should not interfere with goods and services provided by a private business where customers willingly purchase said goods and services. If you don’t like your service, use another provider or go without. The internet is not a right or a necessity , it is a product and government is tasked with protecting our rights. Let the free market work this out. Businesses have a way of cutting each others throats when they see their competition charging prices that seem unfair or have unnecessary stipulations.

  • December 15, 2017 at 9:49 pm

    Net neutrality was nothing more than government controlled internet. The greatest innovations happened before it was passed and will happen again now that it’s a free and open marketplace again.

    • December 15, 2017 at 10:24 pm

      And housing was much better before the stupid government came in and said you can’t discriminate against people.

    • December 15, 2017 at 10:37 pm

      Richard Behmer At least then people were not taking out mortgages they couldn’t afford and neighborhoods weren’t being destroyed by abandoned houses rotting away.

    • December 15, 2017 at 10:56 pm

      I am going to pretend you aren’t advocating for what it sounds like you are advocating for.

    • December 15, 2017 at 11:01 pm

      Richard Behmer I’m advocating for the government to stay out of the housing and the internet market. You know full well that the subprime mortgage fiasco is what tanked the economy in 2008. Every time the government gets involved, cronies get rich and the taxpayers end up holding the bag.

    • December 15, 2017 at 11:13 pm

      Norma Stark Connors. You are spot on It was a regulation put on the net by Obama and the left are up in arms. I for one never thought it was a good regulation and am glad it’s gone.

    • December 16, 2017 at 12:30 am

      When banks are forced to make bad loans on any criteria other than financial worthiness, they have to bundle those loans and sell them to unsuspecting investors in order to get them off their books, it crashes economies. Government needs to stay out of markets.

    • December 16, 2017 at 12:40 am

      Are you really that dense? If someone has a good financial record, they are not discriminated against. If they don’t, they claim discrimination if they are turned down for a loan.

    • December 16, 2017 at 12:44 am

      Lol, ok, I’m done. You can live in whatever little world you have concocted for yourself, enjoy.

    • December 16, 2017 at 12:48 am

      That makes a convenient excuse, but the fact is, banks should not be forced to lend to unworthy credit risks or finance property in areas that are prone to riots or declining property values. Minorities (generally black or Hispanic) who are creditworthy don’t get turned down for loans or choose to buy property in declining neighborhoods.

  • December 15, 2017 at 9:51 pm

    Pretty sure people are freaking out over nothing, it wasn’t regulated before Obama. Didn’t see any any of these fears then.

  • December 16, 2017 at 6:58 am

    The internet was a free market prior to 2015 and it was fine. Net neutrality is govt overreach.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *