Congress Passes Bill To Allow Internet Providers To Sell Browsing Habits of Customers

 

Comcast today said it has “no plans” to sell its customers’ individual Web browsing histories, but Comcast can still deliver personalized ads based on its customers’ browsing history. Comcast, the nation’s largest home Internet provider, said it will continue to offer customers a way to opt out of targeted ads.

“We do not sell our broadband customers’ individual Web browsing history,” Comcast Chief Privacy Officer Gerard Lewis wrote in a blog post today. “We did not do it before the FCC’s rules were adopted, and we have no plans to do so.”

According to the New York Post Comcast, AT&T and Verizon promised on Friday not to sell customers’ Web browsing histories — even though a Congressional resolution this week, soon to become law, would let them do just that.

So how do you protect yourself from Internet providers selling your browsing history? Here are a few tips.

Use a different ISP

Not all ISPs want to harvest their users’ data. In fact, a list of some of the smaller players – including Sonic, Cruzio Internet and Etheric Networks – wrote a letter opposing the repeal of the FCC’s privacy rules. The problem is, most Americans, particularly those in rural areas, have very little choice of broadband provider. About 80% are stuck with just one or two options, so even if they wanted to change, they couldn’t.

Opt out

Without the privacy rules in place, ISPs can track and sell your browsing data by default, but should offer a way for users to opt out. However, they haven’t always been clear about how and when they’ve been tracking users.

We know that AT&T already tried to use consumer data to inject personalized advertising into their browsing experience and then tried to charge an extra $744 per year to opt out, but the program was killed just before the FCC introduced the new privacy rules. Meanwhile, Verizon attempted to insert undetectable “supercookies” into all of its mobile customers’ traffic, which allowed the company to track all their browsing behavior – even if a web user was browsing in incognito mode or clearing their cookies and history. The company was sued for $1.35m by the FCC for not getting customer permission to track them.

AT&T has opt-out options here and Comcast here. Contact your ISP if they don’t have any information on their website.

Use a (paid) VPN

A VPN redirects your internet traffic to disguise where your computer, phone or other device is when it makes contact with websites. It also encrypts the information you send across the internet so that it’s unreadable to anyone who wants to intercept that traffic – including ISPs.

This creates a second layer to the problem: what if the VPNs choose to sell your real browsing behavior? Reputable VPNs won’t do this, but you need to be careful about which one you choose. Generally it’s wise to avoid the free ones – if you’re not paying for it, they must be making money out of you somehow. In 2015, the free VPN service Hola was revealed to be selling its users’ idle bandwidth to paying customers, including possible botnets. Cloak and TunnelBear are good options.

So why did Congress block the rules from being implemented?

Republicans bought into internet providers’ arguments that the rules discriminated against them and could confuse consumers. The rules would prevent internet providers from selling your web browsing history even though, the argument goes, websites like Google and Facebook would remain free to do the same thing. ISPs say that’s unfair and makes it hard for consumers to understand who gets to see their browsing data.

Internet providers want to pretend they’re just like Google and Facebook

But the argument is extremely misleading, if not outright wrong: Google and Facebook can’t see your web browsing history, they can only see what you click on while you’re on their own websites or on websites connected to their ad networks. Meanwhile, internet providers get to see a bit of nearly everything you do and visit; and even with the rules in place, they have every right to build the kind of ad-tracking websites that Google and Facebook have built. It’s just hard work, and they don’t want to do it.

The rules, if anything, put internet providers on a level playing field with companies like Facebook and Google. But Republicans don’t like that it creates more work for them. “These rules do little to enhance privacy but clearly add a layer of red tape on innovators and job creators,” Representative Greg Walden (R-OR), chair of the House’s commerce committee, said ahead of the vote. The rules, he said, “have the potential to stifle one of the most innovative sectors of our economy.”

In an added blow to privacy advocates, the FCC won’t be able to pass privacy restrictions protecting all web browsing history again, since the resolution prevents it.

See also this article here.

Also checkout The Ultimate Guide to Finding the Best VPN by Cloudwards.net

++


Buy or Sell Your Next Home Through Kimberly Taylor
Support This News For $5.00 A Month.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uber paid hackers to cover up massive data breach

Reuters - 2 hours ago
(Reuters) - Uber Technologies Inc paid hackers...

Trump Defends Roy Moore, Citing Candidate's Denial of Sexual Misconduct

New York Times - 6 hours ago
WASHINGTON — President Trump broke with leading...

North Korean Troops Violated Truce While Chasing Defector, UN Command Says

New York Times - 4 hours ago
Clockwise from top left: a North Korean defector...

David Cassidy: Looking Back at the Late Teen Heartthrob's Ups and Downs

PEOPLE.com - 3 hours ago
The actor had won hearts worldwide as the hunky,...

News via Google. See more news like this